artax logo white
Transfer pricing

Deliveries and services between affiliated companies and related parties must be tax-structured in the same way as would be agreed with third parties. If this principle is not adhered to, the tax result will be corrected outside of the balance sheet. In the context of the corona pandemic, new questions arise that could also lead to a retroactive change in transfer prices for 2020. With effect from July 1.7.2021, 14.07.2021, the Foreign Tax Act was comprehensively revised. Germany wants to achieve the principles developed by the OECD for a fairer distribution of taxes for internationally active companies. The OECD did not adhere exactly to the OECD guidelines, but rather introduced its own ideas at the legislative level. In a new BMF letter dated July XNUMX, XNUMX, the tax administration has comprehensively reformulated the previously applicable administrative principles with regard to the documentation and design of transfer prices. The BMF letter binds the administration, but not the taxpayer or the company. A German law or even a BMF letter certainly does not bind the financial administration of other countries. Seen from this point of view, the new law in Germany represents a step towards the internationally applicable OECD guidelines. The BMF letter discloses the view and interpretation of the law by the German tax authorities. However, this does not reduce the need for taxpayers and companies to examine the perspectives in the countries involved.

Table of Contents

No profit shifting through price fixing

Financial authorities around the world ensure that no profit shifting occurs as a result of goods and services between affiliated companies being shifted from one country to another through targeted price agreements.

In order to counteract this and enable controls, standards were created according to which companies must explain what considerations they were guided by when setting their prices. In Germany, the legal obligations are regulated in the tax code and the foreign tax law AStG. The AStG was comprehensively redrafted, partly with effect from July 1.7.2021, 1.1.2022, and partly with effect from January 14.7.2021, XNUMX. The Federal Ministry of Finance responded promptly and fundamentally revised the “Administrative Principles of Withholding Tax Procedure” in a BMF letter dated July XNUMX, XNUMX. The new guidelines must be applied to all pending procedures, which amounts to a de facto retroactive effect.

For companies, this means that they should deal with the new principles, especially with regard to current or future tax audits, and, if necessary, also re-examine completed years. This can be worthwhile both in terms of legal certainty, including in the other countries involved, and financially. The consequence of not recognizing transfer prices either leads to a one-sided correction of results and thus to real double taxation if the other country does not change the old decisions accordingly.

Otherwise, the non-recognition of transfer prices is always an issue that the German tax authorities like to use to accept and tax hidden profit distributions. Since tax audits regularly take place over several years and in the meantime additional years go by, the non-recognition of transfer prices regularly has a very explosive impact. At the same time, transfer prices or their correction are also an effective instrument for offsetting tax losses in one country with taxable profits in the other country and thus saving taxes.

The arm's length comparison will primarily be decisive for the design of settlement prices in business with related companies. If this is not possible, the company must describe the specific business relationship using a qualified risk and functional analysis.

The most important thing about documentation for designing transfer prices is the story, i.e. the description of the reasons why you created a foreign relationship in the first place, why you deal with the affiliated company internally in this particular way and not differently, who has which competencies, which specific ones in the business relationship has opportunities and who bears which risks. It’s about the approach in short”risk & function” . Based on this, the methods that lead to the most appropriate result possible are examined. Transfer pricing documentation is therefore not a price list for goods or services. The documentation describes why this method and no other method is considered to be applicable and what range of percentage surcharges you want to use.

According to German law, as well as most other legal systems, an investigation and documentation must be carried out into the relevance of the so-called standard methods developed by the OECD. It's like a math exam. Simply writing down the result is not enough; the result must be derived. Therefore, the standard methods in question must be discussed in the documentation even if they are not ultimately used.

The financial administration naturally has a lot of data and therefore an industry-specific overview of who achieves which returns on sales. The taxpayer does not have this data. In order not to fight with unequal weapons, you have no choice but to get a specific database analysis if necessary, i.e. spend money on an expert report. The result is a benchmark analysis. The data from comparable companies is analyzed and a range of results achieved between external third parties is presented. Anyone who moves their company within this range can defend their transfer prices to the tax office. If you can't do that, you need good arguments and a strong tax advisor to avoid going under.

Special features due to the corona pandemic

Plan or not, the corona pandemic is forcing every company to rethink its situation. Long-term contracts concluded between third parties are also terminated; the StaRUG, the law on the reorganization and restructuring of companies, which came into force on January 1.1.2021, XNUMX, provides the necessary legal framework for this. If the fictitious third-party comparison is decisive in connection with the structuring of transfer prices, then against the background of the StaRUG there is nothing to prevent a change in the previous practice in the structuring of transfer prices, even within the group or in affiliated companies.

One can actually ask oneself whether the foreign subsidiary or sister company is still able to bear the agreed risks given the pandemic. If this is not the case, the question arises as to which actual economic correction options can be considered in order to ensure the survival of society. The interest of domestic society also plays a significant role. In the opinion of the Bavarian tax authorities, a crisis-related loss situation does not constitute a sufficient reason for changing the previous modalities for structuring transfer prices.

In contrast, in the letter from the BMF dated December 6.12.2018, XNUMX, the Federal Ministry of Finance was of the opinion that restructuring-related measures to support or rescue an affiliated company should be recognized. In order to save a long-term, advantageous business relationship in a crisis, third parties would also seek compromise and accept temporary losses in profits.

Adjustment of transfer prices in exceptional cases

In exceptional cases, and this certainly includes the Corona pandemic, price adjustments can also be made retrospectively. It is necessary to be able to demonstrate that one would have behaved similarly in a comparable film with third parties. When designing transfer prices and of course when changing them, at least two countries are always affected and you should never do the calculation without the host. It is therefore necessary to clearly document the reasons for the adjustment and to discuss them in advance with all the tax authorities involved. Unfortunately, many domestic and foreign tax advisors also shy away from such meetings. But ultimately it's not about them, but about the entire company including its environment, including the customers, suppliers and employees.

Documentation of transfer pricing

Written or electronic records must be created in an appropriate order. The assessment must be possible within a reasonable period of time. Circumstances of the individual case, such as the method used by the taxpayer, are decisive. It is also necessary to document the reason why the specific method for determining transfer pricing was chosen. In contrast to US law, which requires the taxpayer to prove that the method he has chosen to determine transfer prices is the most appropriate, in Germany the taxpayer is only required to record why he considers the method chosen to be suitable.

Failure to comply with the obligation to document the facts and the appropriateness of the transfer prices leads to estimates and surcharges being made because there is then a legally rebuttable presumption of profit shifting.

Outlook

The principles of design and documentation of transfer prices not only apply to affiliated companies, but are also used in the allocation of costs and revenues to taxable permanent establishments.

With its BEPS (Based Erosion Profit Shifting) program, the OECD has defined action points and measures to combat purely tax-driven arrangements. The OECD members and thus also Germany are required to incorporate the corresponding measures into national law. This is done within the framework of the ATAD Implementation Act or the Annual Tax Act 2020. On December 10.12.2020, XNUMX, the Federal Ministry of Finance made the following statement:

“Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules to combat tax avoidance practices having a direct impact on the functioning of the internal market (Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive / ATAD contains a package of legally binding measures to combat tax avoidance, which must be applied by all member states against common forms of aggressive tax planning. Germany already largely meets the minimum standards set by the ATAD. However, there is still a need for adjustment in some areas. With the law implementing the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD Implementation Act - ATADUmsG ) the disentanglement and exit taxation and hybrid arrangements of the ATAD will be implemented and the addition taxation will be reformed and designed in a contemporary and legally secure manner. In this context, the regulations to ensure a fair distribution of taxation rights for multinational companies will be designed in a contemporary manner and a clear legal basis for advance agreement procedures will be created, in order to strengthen legal certainty for administration and taxpayers.” 

This has not yet been enshrined in law, but is expected soon.

Jürgen Bächle
Jurgen Bachle

has been working as an independent tax consultant and expert in international tax law since 1989 and has been a member of the board of the German Association of Tax Consultants Baden-Württemberg, DSTVBW, for over 20 years.

Social
Vimeo

By downloading the video you accept the privacy policy of Vimeo.
Read more

Load video

International tax advice

artax advises internationally active medium-sized companies and private individuals on an interdisciplinary basis in all matters of German and international tax law and related areas as well as in corporate strategy and location issues.

Subject-specific expert knowledge

Convince yourself of our expertise in the area of ​​national and international tax law, find out more about current case law and cross-border commuter issues and benefit from our in-depth specialist knowledge in creating individual tax strategies. Your tax law knowledge database – artax